Jump to content

Talk:Central nervous system cavernous hemangioma

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Made

[edit]

Made some changes to the section on Venous Angiomas to reflect current clinical terminology and thought. Also changed the ICD-9 code to a more appropriate one.

WikiProject class rating

[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 16:24, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

punctate lesion?

[edit]

The term "punctate lesion" is used. Please link to relevant article so lay people can understand. --Treekids (talk) 22:32, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cavernous hemangioma t2.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Cavernous hemangioma t2.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 5 February 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 00:22, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously? "A fox hunter is a hunter who specializes in hunting foxes"?

[edit]

"Central nervous system cavernous hemangioma is a cavernous hemangioma that arises in the central nervous system (CNS)."

I realize this is a statement that makes clear how to parse that five-word phrase, but it makes the article start out on a poorly phrased note. My mom always said you don't define a word by itself ("a farmer is a person who farms" is of little use to those with even a mild understanding of English). The first line of an article should be enlightening in and of itself; it should be the basic information, not something you have to get past to get to the information, and reflecting the definition back on the very words that form the original searched-for term does nothing short of making us look like idiots. Kilyle (talk) 20:00, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Central nervous system cavernous hemangioma. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:06, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]