Jump to content

Talk:Central Vista Redevelopment Project

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Neutrality

[edit]

The "Misconception" section does not maintain any semblance of neutrality; it just repeats government claims about the project in its explicit defense. 140.180.240.253 (talk) 20:52, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Biased edits alert!

[edit]

The estimated cost part of the article is interestingly being edited by a set of users. Both the parties are using exorbitant numbers. https://thelogicalindian.com/fact-check/central-vista-project-25377?infinitescroll=1 per this, the overall cost is around Rs. 20,000 Crore and the annual spendings will be around 1000 crore a year. Please freeze the number and put a protection for page from anonymous edits.--రహ్మానుద్దీన్ (talk) 13:30, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:07, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of regulatory approvals

[edit]

@Venkat TLSomeone removed my edit on a wikipedia page. Please see if you can review. (Ravi Dwivedi (talk) 11:34, 11 September 2022 (UTC))[reply]

I believe the content was wrongly removed by the IP user. I have renamed the section and restored it. Such criticism are informative and normally included. The reason given by IP user is frivolous.--Venkat TL (talk) 16:33, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Potential addition to the reception section

[edit]

I wanted to discuss this before editing. The Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs released this document (https://www.scribd.com/document/510754327/Myths-and-Realities-about-the-Central-Vista-Project#download&from_embed) talking about "myths" of the project and their "realities". How can this information be presented while retaining a relatively neutral point of view. For the nth time (talk) 17:41, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Since no one has responded, I'll try and put some of the stuff up till the time.For the nth time (talk) 16:00, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Actually I double checked if I could use the website on (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources) and since it was discouraged, I used (https://centralvista.gov.in/myths-and-realities.php) instead.For the nth time (talk) 18:41, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]