Jump to content

Talk:Central Rabbinical Congress

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Does not belong in the category anti-Zionism

[edit]

Although they are a rabbinical organization serving mostly the satmar Hasidim they are not defined by anti Zionism--יודל 16:44, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see, and elsewhere you say "its not a seperete group of satmar just a rabbis court from satmar". Man, you don't know what you are talking about. Once again. Yes, Satmar happens to be the most influential group within the CRC - why? because it is the biggest group. Dushinsky, Vizhnitz-Monsey, Skver, Puppa, Nitra, Tosh and other groups are simply smaller! The CRC is the American version of the Edah, representing the US-based kannoim.
Oh, by the way: Could you explain to me why Ger and Belz are not in the CRC? Perhaps because the CRC is so virulently anti-Zionist and they are not? --Eidah 07:31, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Very simple the crc is founded controlled and manipulated by satmar and all those groups who live in America are not against it and for it, Nitra, Viznits and Skver arnt part of it, only Pupa was a honour president but never active role. Period this is a satmar rabbis court and not a separate think--יודל 11:02, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Skver and Viznits are not united in the CRC and there is no Dushinsky in USA

[edit]

Only the Brooklyn groups which identify with Satmar like Spinka Tosh and so on, are realy part in the crc, but seperete groups like Skver have their own differing opinion and own rabbinical establishment, Its true some may ask them questions, but they are not united or incorporated in any shape or form in this group, and the source The Jewish Week only says that the CRC answers their Halachik questions and deals with their disputes, but in no way does the source establish any statement that Skver is part of the CRC, or that Dushinsky even exists.--יודל 13:38, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hahahaha. You are now falling into really weak and silly arguments. Check http://www.nysed.gov/admin/331400/229996.html for example. A government site, even. One of the leading rabbonim of Dushinsky in NY is a well-known personality in the CRC. I forgot his name. --89.138.106.199 18:51, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Central Rabbinical Congress. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:09, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Central Rabbinical Congress. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:54, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Central Rabbinical Congress. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:37, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]