Jump to content

Talk:Central Powers/GA2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: History6042 (talk · contribs) 20:44, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: BarntToust (talk · contribs) 13:42, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Alright, so given that this article was unsuccessfully nom'd about a month ago with strict decline owing to the state of a few citations, I'll have to look into more of those, besides accuracy spot-checks, to see that those concerns from the prior reviewer have been fully addressed. -- Check ref 12, book it cites sure exists -- other refs the prior reviewer had complaint with, Burke, Nicolle, Fage, no longer appear to be used in the article. -- Hagen ref has year now, Pánek has a title, Biondich is in the article now, Roberts is now removed, Wolczuk has a date now, Fattah is gone, Sedik has a date now, Gilkes is removed, Getahun has a date and now links to Google Books. This is all good. The National Archives ref is set right, A World Undone book has repeat refs but not absolute killer to sfn or rp templates. I went ahead and fixed the Cashman and Leonard ref to use Cite book template, among minor instances to use Cite book / RP templates. Further reading is done with some online links, but Cite book not required. I'm impressed with the refs. Coverage I'll look at later.

Current GA review status: Work in progress.

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·