Talk:Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Sword/shield
[edit]Anyone want to elaborate on the sword/shield concept?
- Have a look at Combe v Combe and Walton Stores v Maher. Wikidea 23:31, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
Judgement
[edit]Is it really necessary to have that big chunk of quote in the Judgement section? It seems unsightly and unencyclopaedic. Might it be better to have a brief summary of the main points of the judgement, interspersed with short supporting quotes? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bunburya (talk • contribs) 16:03, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, it's a leading judgment. It works like a casebook. Wikidea 23:29, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
The opening sentence is contradictory. It states Lord Denning's decision was drawing upon Hughes v Metropolitian Railway, but this case was decided well after CLPT. Thus CLPT could not have used Hughes as an authority. This is misleading and poor legal scholar. -- — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.111.13.200 (talk) 05:31, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
- Hughes v Metropolitan Railway took place in the 1870s, long before CLPT. LynwoodF (talk) 14:14, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
Poor citations relating to both the case and judgement quote. suggest OSCOLA? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Will3103 (talk • contribs) 06:11, 11 February 2018 (UTC)