Talk:Center for Class Action Fairness/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Grapple X (talk • contribs • count) 02:38, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

   For the most part, the prose is grand. However, when using quotes, you have a tendency to place a comma before opening the quoted text, which is often disruptive to the flow of the sentence. I'd also advise against retaining a capital letter if the quoted text is part of a sentence, as it's visually jarring. You've got a mixture of "dumb" and "smart" quotation marks there (probably an artefact of working in a word processor prior to adding it to the article), they should probably be standardised - it doesn't matter which you go for, but one or the other uniformly is ideal.

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

   Citations are good. Fixed a lot of unspaced ref tags though - just remember to ensure that any closing ref tags are followed by a space before text resumes.

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

   Scope is good.

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

   Article is neutral and unbiased.

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

   Article seems stable. I see there's a pending case being discussed but I would hardly think its outcome would be controversial enough that the article's stability would be threatened.

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   Sole image is commons and is appropriately used. No problems there.

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   Just a few fixes to be done with how quotations are handled. I'd have sorted it out for you myself but I'm not really sure how you'd prefer to have it done, so I'll let you decide. Shouldn't take much work if you just Ctrl+F the quote marks you want rid of. GRAPPLE X 02:38, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Ah well spotted. I'll try to sort that out shortly.

Howz that, I think I've got em all. If not can you address those outstanding which are problematic? ♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:09, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Good to go. Going to pass this one. Well done! GRAPPLE X 16:08, 13 September 2011 (UTC)