This article is within the scope of WikiProject Textile arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of textile arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Textile artsWikipedia:WikiProject Textile artsTemplate:WikiProject Textile artsTextile arts articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Polymers, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.PolymersWikipedia:WikiProject PolymersTemplate:WikiProject PolymersPolymers articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Forestry, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.ForestryWikipedia:WikiProject ForestryTemplate:WikiProject ForestryForestry articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Materials, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Materials on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MaterialsWikipedia:WikiProject MaterialsTemplate:WikiProject MaterialsMaterials articles
The composite materials section here doesn't make much sense as written. I added a few missing words, but don't know anything about the topic and am hesitant to make changes which may alter what was meant. I've added a copyedit tag to that section, and will be looking back through past versions of the page, to see if it ever made more sense. If anyone could improve the writing there, that would be great. Thanks. Jessicapierce (talk) 22:27, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Just to save anyone else the time of looking, this content (the composite materials section, and several others) has contained the same unclear wording since it was added several years ago. Contributing editor is no longer active. Jessicapierce (talk) 22:31, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I tried cleaning it up a bit, hope I kept the original meaning intact but I can't be sure. I'm also a bit lost on what the table in the Composite Material section is supposed to be, but I kept it for good measure. --Omega625 (talk) 19:37, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I took a shot at cleaning up the section, and hopefully my edits clarify why the section is important/what the table is about. The original reference for that section is unfortunately behind a paywall, so I couldn't factcheck anything or add additional clarifying content. The two bullet points at the end (tensile strength and elastic modulus) are still unclear, and I'm not sure what the original author intended it to mean. Heddles (talk) 01:34, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
