Talk:Cellular automaton/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: —focus 02:37, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I hate to fail articles, but I definitely do not think that this meets the GA criteria. The most obvious problem is references — there are paragraphs; even whole sections without any inline citation. There are also several citation needed tags which must be addressed. Just due to this I believe it fails the quick-fail criteria. I'd also recommend a thorough copyedit, and perhaps a peer review. Better luck next time. —focus 02:37, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]