Talk:Cellarette/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: No Great Shaker (talk · contribs) 04:30, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Commencing review

Well written: the prose is clear and concise.
Well written: the spelling and grammar are correct.
Complies with the MOS guidelines for lead sections.
Complies with the MOS guidelines for article structure and layout.
Complies with the MOS guidelines for words to watch.
Complies with the MOS guidelines for writing about fiction – not applicable.
Complies with the MOS guidelines for list incorporation – not applicable.
Complies with the MOS guidelines for use of quotations.
All statements are verifiable with inline citations provided.
All inline citations are from reliable sources, etc.
Contains a list of all references in accordance with the layout style guideline.
No original research.
No copyright violations or plagiarism.
Broad in its coverage but within scope and in summary style.
Neutral.
Stable.
Illustrated, if possible.
Images are at least fair use and do not breach copyright.

Hello, Doug. I'll be doing this review within the current GAN Backlog Drive and will use the checklist above to register progress. Hope to provide some feedback soon. No Great Shaker (talk) 04:30, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On hold

This is a very interesting article for me to review as I enjoy woodwork myself, but hardly to this standard, and I have been known to appreciate a bottle of wine now and again. There are a few points to consider:

I made a few minor tweaks as I went through and I hope those are okay.

Done --Doug Coldwell (talk) 10:52, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Some extra citations are needed to comply with WP:V – see tags.

Done --Doug Coldwell (talk) 10:52, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The narrative spans the period from 15th century Europe to Prohibition but there is nothing about cellarette design and production in the last ninety years. Another paragraph about recent and contemporary work would round things off.

Working --Doug Coldwell (talk) 10:52, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done Added: Cellarette use declined in the 20th century due to the use of the refrigerator. --Doug Coldwell (talk) 12:12, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I would drop the "see also" section because cabinetry is already linked and I think there is only a tenuous connection between a cellarette and a bar.

Done --Doug Coldwell (talk) 10:52, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent use of imagery. Well written and no problems with OR/POV. It's nearly there and I'll put it on hold for the time being. No Great Shaker (talk) 05:48, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@No Great Shaker: All issues have been addressed. Can you take another look. Thanks. --Doug Coldwell (talk) 12:12, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Passed

Well, we do need fridges, but the cellarette remains a nice piece of furniture and I'd have one myself at the right price. The amendments are fine and I'm promoting this to GA. It's the first one I've passed as part of this GAN drive. Well done, Doug. No Great Shaker (talk) 14:51, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]