Talk:Celio (retailer)

Untitled

This is what I do not get about wikipedia. It is all about how anyone can create articles if they are valid and sighted and this article is valid and sighted. And yet, for some reason, it only seems that people trust admins to do all of the editing. And i see sooooooooooooooo much uncited material which is just common sense, I mean you can;t sight every word, sometimes you just know things which is common general. But, I mean I do not see the reason for a speedy deletion tag. You know, every single edit seems to get reverted if it is not done by an admin. You know, evin if you are an admin, you don't know everything about everything and yet you feel like you have the right to delete this article. I saw that a Celio article was missing and Celio is a fairly big European chain. I do not see the logic. --Lollypoplollypopohlollylollylolly 04:56, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Your article is cited with some sources, yes, but not any secondary sources. Wikipedia has strict policies about notability, especially for companies. In my opinion, for good reason. Review those, and if the article can meet the criteria, then of course it deserves to stay. Regards, Iknowyourider (t c) 05:17, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

You asked me about secondary sources on my talk page -- please read the article I linked to (secondary sources). If you're willing to spend a few minutes reading, then things will make a lot more sense. Regards, Iknowyourider (t c) 18:49, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Celio (retailer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070510072546/http://www.distrijob.fr:80/enseignes/dictionnaire.asp?enseignes=celio to http://www.distrijob.fr/enseignes/dictionnaire.asp?enseignes=celio

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:04, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Celio (retailer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071119011426/http://uk.celio.com/default.php?internalPageId=18 to http://uk.celio.com/default.php?internalPageId=18

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:02, 1 August 2017 (UTC)