Talk:Cefpodoxime
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Cefpodoxime.
|
Cefpodoxime proxetil -Polymorphism
[edit]Does Cefpodoxime Proxetil having any Polymoprhs,If so name the polymorphs ,in advanse wishes to them who helped me out of this problem. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.18.119.107 (talk) 06:56, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
The Article states the following: "Currently, it is only marketed as generic preparations in the USA."
That is no longer true. for example it is being produced by Sandoz GmbH in Austria as a generic and distributed by 1 A Pharma GmbH in Germany under the name "Cefpodoxim - 1 A Pharma".
I will delete the passage from the article shortly if there is no protest....
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cefpodoxime. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060325011459/https://www.pfizer.com/pfizer/download/uspi_vantin.pdf to http://www.pfizer.com/pfizer/download/uspi_vantin.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:10, 1 August 2017 (UTC)