Talk:Cayman Islands at the 2008 Summer Olympics

Cayman Islands at the 2008 Summer Olympics has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 18, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed

British Overseas Territories Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Overseas Territories, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of British Overseas Territories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British Overseas TerritoriesWikipedia:WikiProject British Overseas TerritoriesTemplate:WikiProject British Overseas TerritoriesBritish Overseas Territories articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Olympics Low‑importance

	Olympic Games portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Olympics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OlympicsWikipedia:WikiProject OlympicsTemplate:WikiProject OlympicsOlympics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Caribbean: Cayman Islands Low‑importance

	Caribbean portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Caribbean, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to the countries of the Caribbean on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.CaribbeanWikipedia:WikiProject CaribbeanTemplate:WikiProject CaribbeanCaribbean articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Cayman Islands work group (assessed as Low-importance).

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Cayman Islands at the 2008 Summer Olympics/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dom497 (talk · contribs) 13:53, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:
Quality of article is good.

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
~~See comment section below.~~ Article now complies with MoS.
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:
This section is good.

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
Each statement has at least one reliable reference.

C. No original research:
No original research found.
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:
All major aspects of the topic are covered.

B. Focused:
Article remains focused on the topic throughout.
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
No bias found.
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Article is stable.
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
~~There are currently no images in the article.~~ Licensing of image provided is done correctly.

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
~~See comment section below.~~ An image is provided with a suitable caption.
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
~~See comment section below.~~ Pass!--Dom497 (talk) 18:46, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Remove all links to articles that don't currently exist.
- Done. --Starstriker7^(Talk) 04:11, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If possible, find a picture related to the topic (Flickr might be a good place to check for pictures).
- Flickr is still a difficult website to use in that most relevant photographs are still under an "All Rights Reserved" license. As with previous articles, I will insert images of structures. --Starstriker7^(Talk) 04:11, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Why are there capital q's and then lower case q's? Also, what does "SB" mean? My recommendation is that you put a key at the bottom of the table explaining what the letters mean.
- I have clarified the q issue. The SB one was a bit more difficult; I could not verify all the numbers, so I commented out one of the SBs (seasonal best performance). --Starstriker7^(Talk) 04:11, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
In the Athletics section, I think you should add "men's competition" and "women's competition" as sub-topics and split the current table into two (one table for the men's and one for the women's). The table in the Swimming section of the article is fine the way it is now.
- Done. --Starstriker7^(Talk) 04:11, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article will be on hold for 7 days to allow these improvements to be made. If you have any questions, feel free to post it here or on my talk page.--Dom497 (talk) 16:24, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have passed the article.--Dom497 (talk) 18:46, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Cayman Islands at the 2008 Summer Olympics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:12, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]