Talk:Cause 4 Concern
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cause 4 Concern article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 25 March 2007. The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Notability
[edit]I believe that the fact that C4C's track was featured in a major videogame (GTA III), and the fact that the group ran a label are enough to deserve a mention on Wikipedia. Within the drum'n'bass community, C4C is rather well known and respected. Matveims 09:14, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
More recent article about them
[edit]I've not added this directly to the article as I'm unsure of notability, but plugin manufacturer Ohm Force give a fairly lengthy plug to the then-forthcoming Pandemic album in this blog post. Ohm Force are a reasonably well known company in their field and have plenty of "name" endorsements but I note they don't have their own page here. Here's the link anyway:
http://blog.ohmforce.com/2008/11/04/cause4concern-is-back/
Onesecondglance (talk) 09:16, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
Declined speedy
[edit]@DissidentAggressor: I've declined the speedy since there's just enough here (the GTA III track, working with notable artists) to where this just doesn't fit speedy criteria. This is something that would really only be able to be deleted via AfD because there is a reasonable assertion of notability. This doesn't mean that they would necessarily pass notability guidelines as a whole, just that there's enough here to where speedy criteria doesn't apply. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:57, 19 April 2015 (UTC)