Talk:Cauliflower mosaic virus
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Untitled
[edit]I deleted the stub tag, since I don't consider this article (that I originally started, using text I wrote for my PhD thesis that dealt with this virus) to be a stub. It is 14 sentences, not between 3 and 10, and a concise summary of what is know of this virus. Of course expansion is still welcome, so go ahead. Aletta 19:04, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
- I redirected CaMV 35S promoter here. Please consider merging the material from that article. - Mgm|(talk) 11:50, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
The 35S promoter is a very strong constitutive promoter responsible for the transcription of the whole genome of a Cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) infecting turnips. It causes high levels of gene expression in dicot plants. However, it is less effective in monocots, especially in cereals. The differences in behavior are probably due to differences in quality and/or quantity of regulatory factors. The promoter was named CaMV 35S promoter ("35S promoter") because the coefficient of sedimentation of the viral transcript, whose expression is naturally driven by this promoter is 35S. It is one of the most widely used, general-purpose constitutive promoters. It discovered at the beginning of the 1980s, by Chua and collaborators at the Rockefeller University.
Reference: http://www.patentlens.net/daisy/promoters/242/g1/250.html
I have incorporated this material in the article. I have undone deletion of the references that I had put below the article. As far as I know, references your sources is encouraged. If I am wrong here, please explain it to me on this page, before deleting the references! Aletta (talk) 20:18, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
Replication
[edit]I have tidied up the Replication section to make it more readable. However I'm not entirely sure about the context of the Bacterial DHFR insertion into the genome- I understand it's a good example of inserting a different protein into the CaMV genome but the way it's currently written is a little clunky. Sarahburge (talk) 17:13, 10 December 2010 (UTC) Maybe I don't understand something but fMet-tRNA in plant cell's cytoplasm looks like mistake — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.50.27.5 (talk) 14:30, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
Missing a picture ...
[edit]... of affected cauliflower in the article. Just saying.
--217.81.141.79 (talk) 22:41, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cauliflower mosaic virus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100717144515/http://www.biotecnika.org/microbiology/virus/plant-virus/cauliflower-virus to http://www.biotecnika.org/microbiology/virus/plant-virus/cauliflower-virus
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:52, 1 August 2017 (UTC)