Talk:Cauda equina syndrome

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Neurology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Chiropractic Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chiropractic, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chiropractic on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChiropracticWikipedia:WikiProject ChiropracticTemplate:WikiProject ChiropracticChiropractic articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Neuroscience Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Cauda equina syndrome.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

note

Suggested template for Orthopaedic Conditions (see Talk:Orthopedic surgery) is
Name
Definition
Synonyms
Incidence
Pathogenesis
Pathology
Stages
Classification
Natural History/Untreated Prognosis
Clinical Features
Investigation
Non-Operative Treatment
Risks of Non-Operative Treatment
Prognosis following Non-Operative Treatment
Operative Treatment (Note that each operations should have its own wiki entry)
Risks of Operative Treatment
Prognosis Post Operation
Complications
Management
Prevention
History
--Mylesclough 05:26, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image constituted original research?

The caption of that image looked like it had a reference. Could the caption just be written so it was less how-to-ish, rather than removing the whole thing? Lesion (talk) 18:32, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Suggested reword of caption: "Example pelvic floor exercises (Pelvic Floor Exercises, 2010)". Lesion (talk) 14:45, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Might be an option to include this image on the pelvic floor exercises page too. Lesion (talk) 14:46, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Under pathogenesis, you might mention chiropractic manipulation:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3087049/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.165.220.12 (talk) 16:14, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

eddie. herniated calius inflation

Through strain dysfuctiallity all connected through lower and upper spinal cord in-line in saddle. Eddie william (talk) 17:53, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Society and Culture

Society and culture section is mostly about hospital time, patient characteristics and cost. This section could likely be renamed or incorporated into prevalence or epidemiology.-NeuroResident (talk) 06:00, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

main image

Hello, the current main image (as of 25 may 2022) is misleading because there is a huge red arrow pointing to filum terminale and not actually to the cauda equine. Someone fix pls SKPapillon (talk) 19:40, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I changed it so we use the image without the arrow. That is confusing. We really do need a better image. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 21:56, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]