Talk:Catrake Force

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Catrake Force is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rivers: Waterfalls Low‑importance

	Geography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Waterfalls task force.

Comment

New to Wikipedia but noticed that the images named Catrake Force are actually of East Gill Force at 54-24-18N; 2-09-41W.

Does anyone have access to usable images of the real Catrake?

Hiasakite (talk) 00:08, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

'Real' Catrake is quite a large waterfall on the main river Swale, upstream of the Pennine Way crossing, at the coordinates correctly quoted in the article. Many people confuse the two.

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.115.28.228 (talk • contribs) 00:43, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've corrected the text and photo captions. Dave.Dunford (talk) 16:17, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Catrake Force. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:40, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]