Talk:Catoptric cistula

A fact from Catoptric cistula appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 5 June 2006. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that a catoptric theatre (pictured) was an ancient optical illusion in which a single elaborate scene appeared to be larger than the box that contained it?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2006/June.

Wikipedia

Paris

In a version of a catoptric chamber at the Musée Grévin, Paris, when I was a child and people were more easily amused, there was a mirrored room in which lights were lowered while one facet of the wall was revolved and when the lights were raised, the remaining walls placed us in un forêt immense sous la neige....ooh then in a caverne incrustée de diamants...oh la la... --Wetman 23:09, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Phantom of the Opera

Would it be worth mentioning the torture chamber from the novel Phantom of the Opera that used this technique?

TARDIS

Just a thought: Should this not be linked to the TARDIS article. Same concept, really, just better special effects...

Adam Brink

I don't see how it's the same. It looks bigger on the inside than it does on the outside, but that's it. No mirrors are used, and it's not an optical illusion. — BRIAN0918 • 2006-06-06 14:53

Hi Brian, It doesn't use mirrors, I concede. But it is an optical illusion: seeming smaller on the outside than it is on the inside. Is your objection not that there is no such thing. True, but I did say it was a fictional device and it uses some (fictional) device to create an illuson of smallness to the eye. I'm not suicidal about this, but think that the link enriches your article (which is fascinating - I wondered for a moment whether it was worth making one). Adam Brink [sorry not to sign on for the last mail, by the way. Silly of me.] --Adambrink 11:07, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, it's close enough that it should be included. — BRIAN0918 • 2006-06-07 20:59

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Catoptric cistula. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080725095651/http://shl.stanford.edu:16080/Eyes/machines/ to http://shl.stanford.edu:16080/Eyes/machines/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:38, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]