Talk:Catholic Church in Nepal

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Catholic Church in Nepal article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Catholic Church in Nepal has been listed as one of the Philosophy and religion good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 22, 2006	Good article nominee	Listed
August 12, 2009	Good article reassessment	Kept

Current status: Good article

Catholicism Low‑importance

Catholic Church in Nepal is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Catholicism task list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : see Draft articles
Assess : see Category:Unassessed Catholicism articles; Category:Unknown-importance Catholicism articles
Cleanup : Blessed Virgin Mary (see the talk page)
Collaborate : Invitation template needed, see Category:WikiProject invitation templates
Copyedit : Cuthbert Tunstall
Expand : Angelus; Roman Catholicism in Kosovo; Bishop Adolph John Paschang; Cum sæpe accidere; Altar Society; American Board of Catholic Missions; Bernard Häring
NPOV : Americanism (heresy); Ensoulment
Photo : see Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of Catholicism
Stubs : see Category:Stub-Class Catholicism articles; Category:Catholic Church stubs
Update : Peer review; John Aloysius Maguire
Verify : Archdiocese of Glasgow; Archbishop of Westminster; Bishop; Saint Mungo; Sanctification; Westminster Cathedral
Other : Watch recent changes for Catholicism articles

Christianity: Catholicism Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Catholic Church portal This article is supported by WikiProject Catholicism (assessed as Low-importance).

Nepal Low‑importance

	Nepal portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nepal, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Nepal-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and add your name to the member's list.NepalWikipedia:WikiProject NepalTemplate:WikiProject NepalNepal articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Copyrighted Image

The image included is copyrighted material. There is no fair use comment in the article, and as far as I can tell, no attempt was made to obtain permission from the copyright owner to use the image. MamaGeek (Talk/Contrib) 16:26, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

But there is a fair use rationale and a tag, and a source. Judgesurreal777 16:29, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I just added two fair use tags in the article itself, thought you meant on the image itself. Judgesurreal777 16:32, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Three points:

Assuming you uploaded the image, did you try to obtain permission from the copyright holder?
I'm not convinced of the fair use rationale you provided. I added a fair use review tag to the image, so someone more knowledgable can check it out. This is not the same as a fair use dispute, and will not necessarily lead to its deletion, unless the reviewer takes that route.
I do not think this article should receive Good Article status until this is cleared up.

MamaGeek (Talk/Contrib) 16:54, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take it down and request that they release it into the public domain, and I'll put out a request for a free use image :) I think the GA review can be completed now.Judgesurreal777 18:02, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is a Good Article

After review, I have found this article to meet the qualifications for Good Article status. It is well written and comprehensive, as well as being well referenced. Further enhancements could include more free/fair use images (proper licences is critical to GA or FA status), and further development with current events (regarding the new constitution in Nepal). If you have any questions about my rationale, leave me a message on my talk page. Phidauex 19:17, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

This discussion is transcluded from Talk:Roman Catholicism in Nepal/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.

This article has undergone a reassessment as part of the GA sweeps performed by the Good Article Project Quality taskforce in order to ensure that it still meets the requirements for Good Article status.

This article, like the one dealing with Catholicism in Afghanistan, is very well-written. I find it to be informative and cover all the major aspects of the topic. There are no neutrality or stability issues.

I had a few concerns as I looked through the article. However, since they involved little work, I elected to make the necessary changes myself. I did a little bit of copyediting, updated the dead links for the references, added a more detailed fair use rationale for the image, and added a couple sentences about Nepal's new consitution to bring the article up to date. I don't believe that this constitutes serious involvement with the article, and I can objectively say that the article is up to current GA standards. I am closing this reassessment as keep.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Roman Catholicism in Nepal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060617065919/http://pcusa.org/pcnews/2006/06254.htm to http://www.pcusa.org/pcnews/2006/06254.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:35, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Roman Catholicism in Nepal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:55, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Roman Catholicism in Nepal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:26, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]