Talk:Catherine Stenbock
Appearance
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]Is her birthday correct?--V7ndotcom elursrebmem 11:49, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
Inappropriate referencing format
[edit]Please see Talk:Princess Cecilia of Sweden#Reference format! --SergeWoodzing (talk) 06:17, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
One source tag
[edit]I believe this tag is not an improvement, not neccessary and clutters the top. Will revert again unless convinced. SergeWoodzing (talk) 19:02, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- @SergeWoodzing: I see, I thought the revert may have been done in error and attempted to revert; I meant no offense. I believe the one source tag fits best for the page, given that the page is reliant on one source for 59 of its 65 footnotes (over 90%). Also, given the incompleteness of the other two sources, I believed the tag made sense. I don't think two tags necessarily clutters the top, especially when they are clustered with the multiple issues tag. I believe this tag is appropriate, but I am willing to consider the converse. ThaesOfereode (talk) 19:18, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
- B-Class Women's History articles
- Low-importance Women's History articles
- All WikiProject Women-related pages
- WikiProject Women's History articles
- B-Class biography articles
- B-Class biography (royalty) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (royalty) articles
- Royalty work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- B-Class Sweden articles
- Mid-importance Sweden articles
- All WikiProject Sweden pages