Talk:Catherine Kousmine

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Alternative medicine

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative medicine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Alternative medicine related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Alternative medicineWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative medicineTemplate:WikiProject Alternative medicineAlternative medicine articles

Skepticism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Switzerland C‑class Low‑importance

	Switzerland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Switzerland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Switzerland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwitzerlandWikipedia:WikiProject SwitzerlandTemplate:WikiProject SwitzerlandSwitzerland articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women scientists C‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

re: orthomed

Katherine Kousmine may be a nutritional pioneer in some types and principles of orthomolecular medicine, her nutritional work may precede others, although scientific priority (discovery, use, description, etc) especially in some omniscient international sense is always tricky business. Semantically, she is not "the founder" of orthomolecular medicine. That recognition simply belongs to Mssrs. Pauling and Hoffer who gave name, principle, definition and organization to "orthomolecular" in the 60s and 70s even though current orthomolecular type therapies long preceded the development of orthomolecular medicine as coherent body, at least as early as the 30s in vitamins, and perhaps the turn of the 20th century with various substances as well as studies in metabolism.

Skimming through Google, I don't see Hoffer, Pauling or JOM editor Saul make any direct mention of her. The other concern is that I see her name associated with homeopathic and naturopathic sites and honors, so I have concerns about confusion of her medical and nutritional practices as being (mis)interpreted as canonical to "orthomolecular", too. The Orthomolecular statements about Dr. Kousmine need WP:V WP:RS references where references in English may be problematic.

My preferred approach is this: let's work on her Wikipedia entry here, first.--TheNautilus 01:27, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article has been edited in such a way that it makes Catherine Kousmine some kind of a charlatan. Which she has never ever been. Her method did work, for whom wanted to stick to it, and if you, numb nuts, can't even give it a try, you should stop trying to please everything that is mainstream by selling calomnies and false rumors. Shame on you. It's not even balanced. You just scoff at her with some book references that no one has heard of. If you are doctors, I bet you are the kind that tell the patients, once they weigh only 60 pounds, that you tried everything and if they have a better idea, well, they are welcome. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.13.173.99 (talk) 23:24, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You can't get blood from a turnip

Answer to the previous comment. Wikipedia is not known for its objectivity. It belongs to the system. My English is automatic translation, courtesy of Google

--Estelamargentina12 (talk) 20:22, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Catherine Kousmine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070420010830/http://www.msif.org/en/ to http://www.msif.org/en/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:40, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]