Jump to content

Talk:Cathedral of Saint John the Baptist (Charleston, South Carolina)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

An encyclopedia article, not a prospectus

[edit]

There has been a bit of an edit war relating to the inclusion or otherwise of Mark Thomas, previous Director of Music. This raises a general question of policy, which I would sum up by insisting that wikipeda is an encyclopedia, not a collection of prospectusus. The purpose of a prospectus, or equivalently an institutional website, is to present the institution as it is now, in order to inform and attract potential uses of its services. An encyclopedia article should be timeless, as concerned with the past as with the present. It is worth having and maintaining such an article if the institution has at any stage of its existence been important, and it remains even if the institution itself ceases to exist.
So the staff of an institution fall into two categories: the more important ones, where as far as is known all holders of an office should be listed, and on the other hand those where the names of office holders are not important enough to give at all.
In this case the bishops are listed at Roman Catholic Diocese of Charleston#List of Bishops, and it would perhaps be enough to make that cross-reference. The rectors used to be listed in this article, but the list was wrongly, in my view, removed. On the other hand the names of the more junior clergy are probably not sufficiently notable for inclusion.
The case of Mark Thomas is rather ironic; there used to be a wikipedia article about him at Mark Thomas (musician). The was deleted as being a infringement of copyright material on this page, where no mention of Mark Thomas is now made. Meanwhile because he had moved on, he was deleted from this article. So he has vanished from history. The website is advertising for now. The encyclopedia is a record for ever. Mark Thomas and all other holders of that office should be listed (and if User:Hike888 has access to non-copyright information about him, he/she could even reinstate the Mark Thomas article!). SamuelTheGhost (talk) 19:32, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cathedral of Saint John the Baptist (Charleston, South Carolina). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:33, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Cathedral_of_Saint_John_the_Baptist_(Charleston,_South_Carolina)&oldid=1200701866"