Talk:Cathedral Quartet

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cathedral Quartet article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article was nominated for deletion on 3 December 2018. The result of the discussion was keep.

Christian music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christian music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christian music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Christian musicWikipedia:WikiProject Christian musicTemplate:WikiProject Christian musicChristian music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	It is requested that an image of this person be included in this article to improve its quality.

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Where?

This article doesn't seem to mention where this group practiced/was located. Mar de Sin ^{Speak up!} 23:48, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

They were based in Stowe, Ohio. Word that in however you like. Daniel J. Mount 01:26, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stub

I changed the class to stub (which is what it should have been from the beginning), because after all this time, it still is. Even though there is a lot of text, there's only one reference (and that's in the lead, where it really doesn't belong). There are some users (one has been blocked) who keep adding things without adding any sources. --Musdan77 (talk) 17:39, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Cathedral Quartet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:18, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copy edit run

Hello, This article was flagged with fanPOV since 2008 so I took a run at it. I found a lot of peacock phrases and claims that were not substantiated or supported by information in the provided sources. I am a member of the Copy Editors Guild and since the article had multiple issues, I also flagged it for a second review by someone in the guild. Quick update on what I did:

Checked all the sources - some claims I found no support for such as the reemergence of popularity of Southern gospel being due in large part to Bill Gaither's recording of the 'Homecoming', a tribute album. This makes me think there's a bit of synthesis or original research happening throughout the article.
Flagged primary source claims pointing to website of one of the group members
Removed peacock terms and rephrased sentences where no citation supports the claim being made - generally things about how wildly popular the group was at certain points.
Flagged claims that need citations
Flagged other claims that seem just vague but not quite peacock terms as according to whom (just a call on my part)

The article could use a pair of eyes from the Copy Editors Guild to give this a once over. I did not lift the POV tag because I'm not convinced I got everything and I think the article needs more cleanup. That's it. Cheers! Curdigirl (talk) 18:28, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]