Jump to content

Talk:Catawba River

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Bias?

[edit]

The controversy section reads as if the author is biased against Cabarrus county. I'm not sure how to go about fixing this.

I have re-written the controversy section to appear more neutral. If there are no complaints within a reasonable time period, I will remove the POV tag. --Beware of all enterprises requiring new clothing. (talk) 12:10, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sued?

[edit]

I have read that Southern Carolina is suing Northern Carolina over the amount of water it is draining from this river. Is this true? If so, shouldn't this be mentioned? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.141.118.234 (talk) 01:56, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is true...except that would be South Carolina v. North Carolina (not Southern & Northern). The case is being considered in the Supreme Court but it could be next summer before a ruling is issued. Case can be seen here. If you would like to add it then go ahead and be bold. Cheers,
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► ((⊕)) 03:59, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Catawba River. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:41, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Catawba River. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:42, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Catawba_River&oldid=1200699080"