Talk:Catastrophic interference

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Catastrophic interference article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 24 April 2013 by reviewer Arthur goes shopping (talk · contribs).

Computer science Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
- Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet
Cleanup :
- Computer science articles needing attention
- Computer science articles needing expert attention
Copyedit :
- Computing
Expand :
- Computer science
Infobox :
- Computer science articles without infoboxes
Maintain :
- Timeline of computing 2020–present
Photo :
- Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists)
- Computing articles needing images
Stubs :
- Computer science stubs
Unreferenced :
- WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs
Project-related :
- Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{WikiProject Computer science}}

Activation overlap (Node Sharpening Technique section)

For example, if the activations at the hidden layer from one input are (0.3, 0.1, 0.9, 1.0) and the activations from the next input are (0.0, 0.9, 0.1, 0.9) the activation overlap would be (0.3 + 0.1 + 0.1 + 0.9 )/ 4 = 0.35.

Shouldn't that be (0.0 + 0.1 + 0.1 + 0.9 )/ 4, or is the 0.0 in the "next input" special cased? If so, perhaps some discussion of why would be warranted, as it's not immediately apparent to me why it would be. -- 160.129.138.186 (talk) 18:58, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral point of view violated?

The article explains neural networks as "network approach and connectionist approach to cognitive science". Neural networks are much more than that. This and the subsequent text feels like editorial bias and not an objective, Wikipedia-like overview of the subject.ThisFeelsABitOff (talk) 00:58, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@ThisFeelsABitOff: Neural networks are among the topics that are studied in cognitive science. In what way is the article biased? Jarble (talk) 19:17, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Did GPT 3.5 (Assistant, ChatGPT) solved the problem?

It appears they slightly retrain it on user input. 2A00:1370:8184:9B6:8AA3:B0D:7D41:F644 (talk) 07:44, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]