Talk:Catalyst Pharmaceuticals

This article was nominated for deletion on 20 May 2015. The result of the discussion was delete.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Recreated article

This article was previously deleted per an AfD discussion. I was the deleting administrator. I have determined that the current version of the article is sufficiently different that it is not eligible for G4 speedy deletion. --MelanieN (talk) 22:01, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unregistered accounts are trying to remove all negative criticism from this article

100.8.101.127, 2600:387:5:805::a4 and similar MAC address have repeatedly made non-constructive removal of material without any explanation. Looks to be blatantly bad faith removals to promote the company's image. Paid PR? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shadybabs (talk • contribs) 01:12, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Overinflated History of amifampridine Section? Related to bad faith criticism removal

Unregistered accounts made previous attempts, seemingly in bad faith, to remove the negative criticism. Since those attempts have been unsuccessful, it looks as though the added "History of amifampridine" section appears to be overinflated for the sake of filler, significantly moving down and dwarfing the criticism section. This added section appears to be filler because it is specifically a timeline of facts about that specific drug, as opposed to meaningful relevant information about the company. For example, "Amifampridine, also called 3,4-DAP, was discovered in Scotland in the 1970s, and doctors in Sweden first showed its use in LEMS in the 1980s." This is speculation that this is over-inflated filler in bad-faith, but it seems reasonable taking into account the previous attempts to remove the criticism section entirely. 12bfeldman (talk) 17:42, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]