Jump to content

Talk:Cat Daddy/GA3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Rp0211 (talk · contribs) 21:22, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:


Infobox

[edit]
  • No issues

Lead

[edit]
If you are going to mention it as a dance, I would change it to "Cat Daddy" is a 2010 song by American Hip hop group The Rej3ctz. It is based off a dance of the same name and is from the 2010 mixtape... Rp0211 (talk2me) 18:08, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
done--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 18:24, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I would change the prose of the sentence, so that it makes more sense. For instance, Chris Brown performed the dance during the 106 & Park 10th Aniversary special in October 2010. Rp0211 (talk2me) 18:08, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
O.K.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 18:30, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I actually wanted you to put the latest date where the video had 70 million views. Rp0211 (talk2me) 18:08, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
done.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 18:38, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I just wanted you to mention at least two examples of celebrities in the lead section. Rp0211 (talk2me) 18:08, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Done--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 18:41, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
My apologies with this; I wanted you to put as of what month and year that this video had six million views. Rp0211 (talk2me) 18:08, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Done.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 18:55, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Original version

[edit]
  • Then, the Rej3ctz released a video of the song, featuring Brown dancing, that was made at Venice Beach in the summer of 2010. → Verifiable?
This issue needs to be addressed before I pass this article. Rp0211 (talk2me) 18:08, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Had to use YouTube in this instance.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 19:04, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Noted. Rp0211 (talk2me) 19:45, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I misinterpreted this, so this issue has been addressed. Rp0211 (talk2me) 18:08, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • As of 7 May 2012 the original December 2, 2010 upload of the official video has over 66 million YouTube views,[8] → Fix date formatting to be consistent with rest of article
This issue needs to be addressed before I pass this article. Rp0211 (talk2me) 18:08, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 19:05, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • ...while an alternate March 9, 2011 upload of the video has an additional 4 million plus views.[9] → Only include official information
This issue needs to be addressed before I pass this article. Rp0211 (talk2me) 18:08, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
These are identical official videos uploaded to alternate file hosts.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 19:07, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Noted. Rp0211 (talk2me) 19:45, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cover versions

[edit]
Since there is only one Daytona 500 per year, it is not necessary in this instance. Rp0211 (talk2me) 18:08, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
How many readers will remember the date of the 2012 Daytona 500 forever? We want to be clear that this occurred a few months before the Cat Daddy phenomenon.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 18:57, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I would agree to this if it was not wiki-linked. Since it is wiki-linked, readers can access information such as the date it occurred. Rp0211 (talk2me) 19:45, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tracklisting

[edit]

Chart performance

[edit]
  • No issues

Release history

[edit]
  • No issues

Notes

[edit]
  • Only italicize publications such as magazines and newspapers
  • Wiki-link the work and publisher (if possible) if it has its first appearance in the section
  • If a source repeats in the section, do not wiki-link it as it was mentioned before
I understand what you are saying, but doing so repeatedly would violate WP:OVERLINK. Also, I still see numerous issues with this section; I can go over each reference and put what needs to be fixed if you want. Rp0211 (talk2me) 18:08, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The guideline that you cite says, footnotes are an exception: "Generally, a link should appear only once in an article, but if helpful for readers, links may be repeated in infoboxes, tables, image captions, footnotes, and at the first occurrence after the lead."--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 19:20, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It talks about it being helpful to readers. I'm talking about instances with, for example, references 26-31. Rp0211 (talk2me) 19:45, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Even thought it appears redundant, many readers are able to see mouseover details and do not look down at the actual notes section. They only see the specific footnote for the number that they are mousing over. Thus, repeated content helps a reader who is only reading any one of the individual hooks. That is why I generally repeat footnote content. I don't assume the reader is reading through the footnotes at the bottom.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 20:23, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Noted. Rp0211 (talk2me) 21:37, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Make sure everything complies with WP:REF


After thoroughly reviewing this article, I have decided to put it on hold at this time. There are numerous prose issues, reference formatting errors, among other things. I decided to put it on hold because I believe you can fix these issues within the general seven days. Also, make sure to expand the information about the original version of the song, including things like background information, lyrics, critical reception, etc. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask. Rp0211 (talk2me) 22:38, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

All of the issues have been addressed above, except the Daytona 500 issue. Besides this, I mentioned expanding the information on the original version of the song. Try and include things like background information, lyrics, critical reception, and a possible music sample so this article can be broad in its coverage. Rp0211 (talk2me) 21:37, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Removed the Daytona date.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 01:13, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Since it has been more than seven days and all of the issues have not been addressed, I am going to have to fail this article for good article nomination at this time. Once these issues are addressed, you are more than welcome to renominate this article. Rp0211 (talk2me) 17:15, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I am a bit confused on why this was failed. I am unaware of outstanding unresolved issues.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 17:26, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Due to miscommunication between the nominator and the reviewer, I am reopening this article to fix the remaining issues that are left and will give the nominator seven more days. Rp0211 (talk2me) 00:50, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. I am working on some RL stuff for the next 3 days, but starting Thursday or Friday I expect to get to these issues.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 15:49, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rp seems to have disappeared, and everything seems fine here, so I'll pass the article. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 01:20, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Cat_Daddy/GA3&oldid=1060760418"