Talk:Cat's Eyes

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Pop music

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.

Alternative music

	Rock music portal This article is part of WikiProject Alternative music, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopedic coverage of articles relating to alternative rock. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.Alternative musicWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative musicTemplate:WikiProject Alternative musicAlternative music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

GNG/NBAND

If having two independently notable members wasn't enough, this easily passes both of these guidelines on the coverage that exists, e.g.

The Guardian: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]
Pitchfork: [8], [9], [10], [11], [12]
NME: [13], [14], [15], [16]
Clash [17], [18], [19], [20]
GQ: [21]
The Skinny: [22]
Exclaim!: [23]
Louder Than War: [24]
FACT: [25]
UNCUT: [26]
Gigwise: [27]

etc. etc. So please explain how this fails either WP:GNG or WP:NBAND and why using proposed deletion is remotely appropriate here. --Michig (talk) 19:07, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Um none of those sources were present in the article, and PROD was more than appropriate because, at the time, there was no real assertion of notability. Giant Snowman 11:08, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Both members' articles linked, two albums on major labels, so plenty of indication that the subject is notable. A Google search would have made it obvious. The prod of the album article, which already had at least 5 good sources on the basis that it was "non-notable fancruft" that "Fails WP:NALBUMS and WP:GNG" is simply ridiculous. --Michig (talk) 11:13, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

CatsEyes CE Shot2 134 F.tif

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:52, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]