Talk:Castlegar, British Columbia

This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Canada: British Columbia / Geography / Communities Mid‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject British Columbia.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Geography of Canada.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian communities.

Humidex

If the humidex figure is an error, WHY ARE WE LISTING IT ON THE TABLE!? Let's find the highest non-error number, and put that in. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.68.61.66 (talk) 16:35, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Who says what is more important than what is being said. Environment Canada is a reliable source, so it MUST be included in the table no matter how obvious it is that it's wrong. If a blog explains why the moon landing actually took place, it is considered unreliable by Wikipedia. If a reliable source says the landing was faked, that's considered more reliable. Basically, a reliable source is innocent until proven guilty while a blog is considered guilty until a reliable source exonerates it. Tatlayoko (talk) 20:51, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]