Talk:Castle Hill, Mere/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Dank (talk · contribs) 01:55, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
Review.
- "At the same time the village was expanded into a planned town, including with an unofficial market.": ... a planned town with an unofficial market.
- "After Richard, his son Edmund inherited the property": I think I prefer "Richard's son Edmund inherited the property" - Dank (push to talk) 01:55, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
- The toolbox gives 3 "not founds" for external links. Otherwise:
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Thanks Dank. I've updated the Parish Council links. The toolbox is suggesting that the gatehouse link is also broken, but this seems to be incorrect - clicking on the link appears to get through to the website correctly. Hchc2009 (talk) 07:39, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
- Passed. Everything checks out. - Dank (push to talk) 11:58, 23 June 2013 (UTC)