Talk:Castile

Changes did not improve the disambiguation

Last changes made the disambiguation less exact , itroduced clear errors and were not justified with a summary. I vote for the restoration of the former definitions unless some clear reason is given.--Garcilaso 18:55, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Every blurb comes directly from the linked articles' ledes, if you have objections you may need to take it up with the editors of those articles first (since disambiguation pages are generally not the most appropriate forum for content disputes). Ewlyahoocom 19:36, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Even the new order puts the most anecdotically linked terms first!--Garcilaso 18:57, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is there something wrong with having the places in spain in one section, and the other places are in the following section? Forgive my ignorance, but what does "anecdotically linked term" mean? Ewlyahoocom 19:36, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also note that there was lots of duplication between Castile and Castilla. Ewlyahoocom 19:44, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

d.C.?

Okay, I'm confused... what's d.C.? Is that supposed to be AD or C.E.?Saffolicious (talk) 07:36, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This may refer only to Castile, the kingdom, because of its importance and because it gives the name to the other sections. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.26.102.10 (talk) 21:03, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]