Talk:Castielfabib
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
I wanted to copy edit this article but the complete lack of citations made me feel uncomfortable copy editing for information I couldn't verify. I think this article should be considered for deletion. At the very least it needs someone to confirm any amount of information here. BishopsHouseofHorrors (talk) 05:26, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
- Why don't you add References or Citation needed templates for those sections or claims that you find dubious? In any case, the town does certainly exist, so deleting the page is out of the question. --Jotamar (talk) 01:10, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
- I only suggested deletion because of the sparsity of verifiable information and lack of notability (albeit only perceived as not notable by me. I am just an ignorant American). I did not mean to offend. I suppose the reason I did not add citation needed tags was cowardice. BishopsHouseofHorrors (talk) 01:42, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
- Basically every tiny town in the world can have a WP page; as far as it exists and it's inhabited, it is notable enough. Regarding the contents, there is a lot of info in WP that is difficult to verify; I see that you're new here, and as an experienced editor, my tip is: concentrate on verifying only those statements that are particularly difficult to believe, or particularly important in some way. Regards. --Jotamar (talk) 18:15, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
- I only suggested deletion because of the sparsity of verifiable information and lack of notability (albeit only perceived as not notable by me. I am just an ignorant American). I did not mean to offend. I suppose the reason I did not add citation needed tags was cowardice. BishopsHouseofHorrors (talk) 01:42, 16 January 2019 (UTC)