Talk:Cash game

Gambling: Poker Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gambling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gambling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GamblingWikipedia:WikiProject GamblingTemplate:WikiProject GamblingGambling articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Poker (assessed as Mid-importance).

WikiProject Gambling To-do:

Current collaborations:

Improve an article to FA

Improve an article to A

Help with the Gambling articles needing attention.
Tag the talk pages of Gambling-related articles with the {{WikiProject Gambling}} banner.
The link to the Missouri gambling site is now out of date and needs to be updated.
Japan section reads as though it was written by the gambling industry - quotes of 160% returns are 'citation needed'.

Redirect request

Resolved

– Moot: Ring game is no longer an article, but a disambiguation page, so no such redirects would make any sense any longer; article remains at cash game.

please redirect cash game and cash games to ring game, which shows up below 10 other results. thanks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 209.247.22.8 (talk) 18:46, 5 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Etiquette

Resolved

– No objections to the edit were raised.

I added "Etiquette usually discourages players from cashing out immediately after winning a large pot, particularly in private games." but it was removed. Is this really not common? Are you really saying that in any private game, it would be ok to arrive at the game, win a huge pot, then leave before the next hand? Stevage 05:03, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Page rename request

Resolved

– Article is now at cash game, and ring game is a disambiguation page.

As per my recent edit, I think that it would be much more appropriate to have this article entitled "cash game" and have "ring game" redirect to it. As indicated by my reference to Super System 2, "ring game" is actually a rather ambiguous term that has various definitions in common usage. FlowerChildXL (talk) 00:36, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Brunson's definition

I know he's a famous (even iconic ;) player but I think adding his obscure definition of "ring game" unnecessarily confuses the reader. Hazir (talk) 21:46, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Since it exists, a case can be made that it can be made, and even suggests that this is a more appropriate URL than the ring game URL, but it should be clear in the article that Brunson's def is the exception, not the norm. 2005 (talk) 00:24, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cash game. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100204040201/http://www.onlinepokerfaq.com:80/guide/game-types.html to http://www.onlinepokerfaq.com/guide/game-types.html
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.pokermagazine.com/Poker-Rules/poker_chips_etiquette.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:58, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]