Casefile is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Podcasting, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of notable podcasts and podcast-related information on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PodcastingWikipedia:WikiProject PodcastingTemplate:WikiProject Podcastingpodcasting articles
Hello Jabberjaw, it looks like you edit this article quite a bit. It looks like the two lede paragraphs are copied and pasted from here: [1]. I was going to just tag the lede, but I didn't see an option for a small maintenance tag. I could open a copyright violation investigation for the section, but that often takes time especially since they would need to rewrite the content rather than delete it. I can't tell if the link is a mirror of Wikipedia or not. If it is we should probably add it to the list of mirror websites. If not we should rewrite the lede and probably perform a revdel. Let me know what you think and how you'd prefer to proceed. TipsyElephant (talk) 18:33, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. Yes, the article was feeling a bit aged and needed a spruce up... so thanks for helping to trigger that. Regarding this supposed "copyright violation", to be honest, I am not sure if this is sincere or that you are simply trying to be disruptive. For example, a simple review of the lead's formation back in mid-March 2018 (eg, here, here, here, here, and here) shows no evidence of a single copy/paste by me from any other site. Similarly, the lead, as shown in these edits, is clearly evolving towards the version you mention as copy/pasted, which does not make sense if it was already a copy/paste from the start. Further, the lead clearly has citations but you do not specify that any of the content was copied from them. As for being a mirror, the website you specify clearly is - since you would also have to lodge copyright claims on most other Wikipedia pages the site lists, such as My Favorite Murder, Lore, Going West, Dirty John, and probably every other podcast listed there, as they are also easily identified as potential copy/paste violations too with simple Google search comparisons. Finally, Google also shows elements of the lead to have been duplicated here and here (among others) so, for me at least, any assertion of copy/pasting from that site in this instance is clearly unsubstantiated. JabberJaw(talk)03:37, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I ran earwig and it came back with a match. I'm in no way trying to be disruptive, which is incredibly obvious considering I brought it to the talk page and pinged an editor actively involved in editing the page for their opinion. If you check my edit history I've opened copyvio investigations for multiple other podcasts and in all instances the content was removed. TipsyElephant (talk) 04:40, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]