Talk:Casa Wiechers-Villaronga

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Puerto Rico Low‑importance

	Puerto Rico portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Puerto Rico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to Puerto Rico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Puerto RicoWikipedia:WikiProject Puerto RicoTemplate:WikiProject Puerto RicoPuerto Rico articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

dates in article and source for more info

The article states the house was designed and built in 1911, while the NRHP infobox created from the National Register Information System (NRIS) database shows in 1921. The NRIS date of 1921 could possibly be a typo (there have been some others, reported at wp:NRIS info issues), or it could refer to a different date of significance for the place, perhaps the occurence of a significant event or the beginning of association of a famous person with the place. To determine this, it would be great if anyone would care to obtain the free NRHP application document for the site, to be obtained by email request to nr_reference (at) nps.gov. doncram (talk) 15:52, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Someone did obtain and use the NRHP nom document in developing this article, great. In these edits, i updated that to link to the on-line-available copy, and to use the {{rp}} reference page supplement so that multiple occurrences of the reference use can be handled with just one reference, while indicating different pages. --doncram (talk) 13:19, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Banco de Ponce clarification

An IP editor in this edit removed mention of a Banco de Ponce (building) designed by same architect, with reason in edit summary given as the fact that the Banco de Ponce building had a different named architect. But, it's quite possible for many architects to work on the same building, in same or different renovations and extensions, and even for reasonable people to disagree about which architect was the main one deserving credit. I have not consulted the source supporting the previous assertion, but I believe it was sourced and remains true and should be restored. Some clarification would help, though. --doncram (talk) 13:05, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Besides, it was correct the way it was written, that according to the citation that was already there. Regards. Mercy11 (talk) 17:42, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]