Jump to content

Talk:Casa Milà/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Parabolic or catenary

The caption for the arches picture says "Parabolic or catenary arches under the terrace of Casa Milà". They can't be both parabolic and catenary, as these are mathematically different curves (as the catenary article notes). I think they'll be catenaries: Gaudi used a complicated model made from hanging threads and suspended weights to model Segrada Familia, which would produce catenaries in that design. If he used the same mechanism for la pedrera, then these curves would be catenaries too. Still, it would be better to cite a source to that effect than just an inference from another of his buildings. -- Finlay McWalter | Talk 02:26, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

Gaudi's designs are generally parabolic, not catenary (although the distinction is tiny for masonry arches rather than pure geometry). A catenary is very similar, but is the form of a flexible cable loaded uniformly along its length. A parabola is the result if the load is evenly distributed along the horizontal axis. For an arch in a uniform wall, the idealised shape more closely approximates the parabola. I note that it's also common to see these same forms described as hyperbolic Andy Dingley 21:55, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

First section is quite clearly ridiculous

The whole section 'Criticism and Controventry' is just completely wrong in every possible way. For example 'The building really is terrible and did not use any rules of conventional style, which is why he received much criticism'. I suspect vandalism.

Art Deco

Interior design photos are captioned "Art Deco", yet they pre-date the Exposition by 20 years Andy Dingley 21:55, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Technical Page Issues

The table of contents appearsVERY far down the page, to the point where it isn't usefull. I'm new here, and can't figure out how to move it up to the top of the page where it belongs!68.6.52.59 14:12, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

  • I fixed it by adding a section. Wikipedia automatically adds it above the first section above the introduction but the first section was a long way down the page. Also, you should add new discussions at the bottom of the page, not in the middle or at the top. I've moved it there myself. Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 14:42, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Comparisons

Dieresis (talk) 07:55, 18 November 2007 (UTC) I don't know exactly what "biomorphic" means, but I see no similarity between this building and the Guggenheim or Disney examples included in this article. Agreed - in fact, the Wikipedia article on "biomorphism" does not note any of these buildings - but ironically does give attention (and a photograph) to La Sagrada Familia. I suggest that this section be deleted if no one objects. Fromthemitten (talk) 13:30, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Overall Text

The translation from the Catalan article has resulted in a poor, and difficult to understand, English version. Coupled with the now non-existent references, we have an article in English that doesn't do justice to this architectural masterpiece. I will do what I can to make it clearer and find some references, but help from a bilingual Catalan/English reader would be welcomed. Fromthemitten (talk) 13:30, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

This is just what happens when you rely on a computer to translate a text: you need a interpretation of it all, which is not a good thing because it takes too much time. I'll do what I can, too. DeckerParsec (talk) 19:17, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Translation cleanup log

In this section, I would like to track the progress made in cleaning up this page's translation from Catalan (added around March 2013), so that we may know which parts have been done and which ones still need work. --HyperGaruda (talk) 09:56, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

  • Comment: Turns out, the original ca & es versions don't really represent properly what's in the Anuari 1912 reference, so neither do we. (This is a pdf that took over an hour to download at high speed (90Mbps/sec) which I assume must be a slow server at the other end, but will look to the casual user like a dead link or non-responsive server.) So, I've added a longish quote= excerpt to the {{Cite book}} so people can decide for themselves. I may change the original es and ca articles based on this. Mathglot (talk) 01:56, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Casa Milà. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:55, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Done. Mathglot (talk) 10:58, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 4 September 2019 and 28 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Cmayer96.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 16:53, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Casa_Milà/Archive_1&oldid=1251001893"