Talk:Carvedilol

Pharmacology High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Medicine Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Carvedilol.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Elainelin20, Tgu20, RobP20, Ally-oop20. Peer reviewers: Sophien21, PharmIsPhun21, Ybyakina19, Ehalon19, Laivazyan19, Samalexmorgan19.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 16:53, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

I added the NEJM 2001 article in the references, because it specifically states that carvedilol improves survival, not just the combined endpoint. Nbauman 15:38, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The "side effects" note [as of March 20, 2009] is ridiculous! Based on a single anecdotal report, the author of this part of the drug description chose to reference only this/these symptoms on the basis of the case report. The official FDA insert does reference sleep/dream disturbance, but only in the lower tier of possible effects (0.1% - 1% incidence); there are many, many other, more significant and relevant, side effects that are reliably reported, and probably reflect properly designed, random, controlled clinical studies. This idiotic reference is a great example of why Wikipedia is such a trashy resource! You've got all sorts of people briefly checking an entry like this and getting concerned about very unlikely and uncommon side effects... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Malamati (talk • contribs) 18:41, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Levo vs. Dextro distinct pharmacological actions : note the Thalidomide case, not enough research data exists for both carvedilol enantiomers and the creation of a separate section within this article with the headline enantiomers is misleading, one (not me.) should integrate that section into the first paragraph, this drug is given a racemic, probably just because it is cheaper for the drug industry to synthesize racemic mixtures. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.156.56.120 (talk) 02:36, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Available Dosages

Carvedilol's available dosages only reflects one brand name formulation. I have, in front of me, Carvedilol generic in 25mg tablet form, made by Mylan. Can someone who have more knowledge on this subject add the general forms available? I'm wondering, though, if this long list of information (each brand name formulation's dosing, generic dosing) should be excised completely. Pyrogen (talk) 12:37, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

3D formulae

The 3D formulae in the box shows only one enantiomer. However, Carvedilol is a racemate (1:1 mixture of two enantiomers). Thus, 2D and 3D structure are not in agreement with each other. Best regards, --Jü (talk) 15:14, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

UCSF Pharmacy Group 20 edits on 11/4

We made the following edits: -Changed lead section to include just the US brand name - before it listed various international brand names. -Edited the Pharmacology section to include more relevant information regarding the Mechanism of actio -Deleted Enantiomer and Social and Culture sections which we felt were excess information, and deleted uncited statements -Added guideline cited information to medical uses section -Edited the side effects section to include bullet points of common side effects and added two vital precautions for users of Carvedilol — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tgu20 (talk • contribs) 21:54, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

PharmIsPhun21 (talk) 02:34, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

UCSF Peer review Group 21 11/8/2015

Neutral POV - Yes
Verifiable Citations – Yes, but expand on the US patent citation so someone can look it up

Recommendations:

Lead: Wikipedia is worldwide. Do not be US-centric. Should include international brand names
Medical Uses: Include name of 2013 guideline in article so readers can easily refer to it. Perhaps include special populations
MOA: incorrect beta receptor information; Expand on inverse agonism (confusing)
Side Effects: Comment on prevalence, so readers know what is common/rare and the red flags to look out for
Formulations: Be thorough and include other formulations
Expand on inexistent chemistry section; include structural activity relationship, absorption

PharmIsPhun21 (talk) 02:34, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Group 19 Peer Review

Neutral point of view - Yes
Yes, they cite the prescribing info and guidelines
This draft is a good start, especially with citing credible sources. We suggest improvements such as adding drug-drug interactions, contraindications, metabolism, and including percentages for side effects. Because Wikipedia is also an international source, other brand names used in other countries can also be included.

Ehalon19 (talk) 04:25, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: PHMD 2040 Service - Learning Fall 2023

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 31 May 2023 and 29 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): PharmD2026 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by PharmD2026 (talk) 01:51, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]