Talk:Carpenters Bridge, Delaware

This article was nominated for deletion on 1 August 2012. The result of the discussion was keep.

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Delaware portal This article is supported by WikiProject Delaware (assessed as Low-importance).

Bridges and Tunnels Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Deletion

I've nominated this article for deletion under the WP:N policy. There is only one print source and a search of the web yielded no other reliable sources. The bridge is said to be historic but no documentation is provided to support this. Additionally, there is a clear contrast between the substance of this article and all the others under the Category:Bridges_in_Delaware list.Rjp422 (talk) 13:38, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Save Article

I just looked at the page and new secondary internet references has been added and links making it no longer an orphan. I find it interesting that a bridge, has a road named after it and two Zip code designated communities (on either side of the bridge) has changed from not notable to being notable. The article may need to be renamed 1) because there is two other Carpenter Bridge articles on Wikipedia and adding the state may help. A disabig page may need to be done. 2) I think most of the confusion is that the bridge is referred to as Carpenters Bridge using an older name for it, while Kent County and the community refer to it as Carpenter Bridge. No doubt the pre-1962 was named for someone. The article is a stub, but I can see it being expanded a bit more. I think this article should be not be deleted. I voted Keep. Jrcrin001 (talk) 05:29, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please see

Please see the discussion here. Jrcrin001 (talk) 00:25, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Carpenters Bridge, Delaware. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:42, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]