Talk:Carolyn Sherif

Carolyn Sherif was nominated as a Social sciences and society good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (January 8, 2013). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Mid-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Psychology Mid‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women scientists Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	It is requested that an image(s) be included in this article to improve its quality.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	It is requested that a photograph be added to this article to improve its quality.

Updating Carolyn Sherif page for my psychology course

Hi all, I just wanted to write in advance to let the community know that I'll be editing this page in the next few days as part of a Psychology project for a graduate course. Cheers, Laurelgd (talk) 04:38, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Carolyn Sherif/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Khazar2 (talk · contribs) 14:52, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be glad to handle this review. I'll note some initial action points below. Thanks in advance for your work on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 14:52, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Initial action points

The lead section does not appear to properly summarize the article per WP:LEAD--it should give an overview of Sherif's life, work, and major theories, rather than describing her birth.
The article often slips into a promotional or "peacock" tone (see WP:PEA). Examples include: " She also assumed a leading role in psychology both nationally as well as internationally"; "As both a dedicated researcher and mentor"; "In what is now considered a classic study in social psychology"; " later translated her expertise"; "outlined a seminal theory", etc. Occasionally this is only sourced to Sherif's own work. Please rewrite for more neutral language, sourced to independent secondary sources.
It's disorienting that the article is at "Carolyn Sherif" but calls her "Wood Sherif" throughout; this article might need to be moved.
The article contains loads of praise of Sherif's work, but no criticism. If her work is seminal and preeminent, it seems like some critics would have appeared at some point; if no critics have appeared, I'm a bit skeptical of the claims being advanced here.
Much of the summary of Sherif's work cites Sherif as its main source. Is it possible to find secondary sources describing her work instead? What do outside critics consider to be her most important ideas?
The article has no image, which is another obstacle to its passing GA review. Can one be found?

Thanks for your attention to these! I'll be glad to answer any questions you have about the above comments. -- Khazar2 (talk) 15:05, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Since it's been a week without action, I'm closing this as not ready for listing. Please feel free to address some or all of the above points and renominate in the future, however. -- Khazar2 (talk) 15:48, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Carolyn Sherif. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:54, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]