Talk:Carolyn A. Maher

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Women scientists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because it is being edited --98.14.128.64 (talk) 01:38, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because it is factually correct (your reason here) --World.Peace.III 01:44, 10 March 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Schmeelk (talk • contribs)

Comment

There was an issue because some information was copied directly from the source - and there was a heavy reliance on quotes, which is also a copyright violation. In addition, the quotes were not really encyclopedic content. So, I made some edits and removed the speedy deletion tag.–CaroleHenson (talk) 04:25, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Since the source that was provided is her work site, it's not an independent source. For reliable, WP:Secondary sources check the following links Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL.–CaroleHenson (talk) 04:25, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]