Talk:Carnaby's black cockatoo
Carnaby's black cockatoo is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on June 8, 2017. | ||||||||||
|
This article is written in Australian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, program, labour (but Labor Party)) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Carnaby's black cockatoo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111114171203/http://environment.gov.au/biodiversity/threatened/publications/pubs/tsday08-cockatoo.pdf to http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/threatened/publications/pubs/tsday08-cockatoo.pdf
- Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5QE8rvIqH?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.birdlife.org to http://www.birdlife.org
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:46, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
"Southwest Australia"
[edit]It is unclear from the first sentence of this article whether C. latirostris is endemic to southwest Australia (that is, the general southwestern region of Australia) or to Southwest Australia, to which biodiversity hotspot's entry the phrase "southwest Australia" is hyperlinked. I'd edit it myself, but it's not clear to me which is accurate since I know next to nothing about the bird in question. MaltaGoya (talk) 00:23, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
- Good question, it's across the southwestern corner of the country. Given it's a bird and not a plant, we'd not really talk about the southwest botanical region in this sense I guess. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:40, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
- Wikipedia featured articles
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page once
- FA-Class Australia articles
- Low-importance Australia articles
- FA-Class Western Australia articles
- Low-importance Western Australia articles
- WikiProject Western Australia articles
- FA-Class Australian biota articles
- Low-importance Australian biota articles
- WikiProject Australian biota articles
- WikiProject Australia articles
- FA-Class bird articles
- Mid-importance bird articles
- WikiProject Birds articles
- Wikipedia articles that use Australian English