Talk:Carlos Yulo/GA1
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: Arconning (talk · contribs) 13:56, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Stevie fae Scotland (talk · contribs) 18:16, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Will get started on this this evening.
- Riley1012 pinging the co-nominator. Arconning (talk) 12:32, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | Just a couple of things:
| |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | Some here too:
| |
2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | ||
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). |
Spotcheck on refs 1, 14, 28, 40, 76, 96, 108 All look like reliable sources although the quality of English in the Philstar is unusual. Is this standard of Filipino English? I'm unfamiliar with it so would appreciate your input.
| |
2c. it contains no original research. | Infobox:
The Competitive history section is unsourced although I believe everything is in the prose above it. Can you make sure everything mentioned in the table is sourced above? I'd rather there was a source for the table (or for each row in the table) but if it is sourced in the prose, I think that should be okay.
| |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | Checked with Earwig's Copyvio Detector | |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | ||
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | My only thoughts here are the lack of a personal life section. I'll understand if there aren't the sources to add it though.
| |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | ||
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | Recent edit history is stable | |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | All tagged and captioned appropriately | |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | ||
7. Overall assessment. |
- It's looking good so far. I've not quite got the time I thought tonight but I will complete this over the weekend. Added a few initial thoughts though. Stevie fae Scotland (talk) 18:50, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Stevie fae Scotland I fixed some of your comments already, waiting for further instructions. :) Arconning (talk) 12:29, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, I've finished the prose review. Looking for your feedback on some gymnastics-specific things I'm not sure of though. Will move on to spot-checking sources next. Stevie fae Scotland (talk) 17:29, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- Finished the review now, thanks for your patience. Placing on hold to allow you to look over my comments. Stevie fae Scotland (talk) 18:39, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Stevie fae Scotland I think I've finished most of the comments? Let me know if you have any other problems and I'll fix 'em right up. :) Arconning (talk) 12:21, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Cool, I'm happy with that and your explanations as well. Thanks for all your work on this. Stevie fae Scotland (talk) 12:46, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Stevie fae Scotland I think I've finished most of the comments? Let me know if you have any other problems and I'll fix 'em right up. :) Arconning (talk) 12:21, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Finished the review now, thanks for your patience. Placing on hold to allow you to look over my comments. Stevie fae Scotland (talk) 18:39, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, I've finished the prose review. Looking for your feedback on some gymnastics-specific things I'm not sure of though. Will move on to spot-checking sources next. Stevie fae Scotland (talk) 17:29, 20 July 2024 (UTC)