Jump to content

Talk:Carlos Landín Martínez

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Carlos Landín Martínez/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Willbb234 (talk · contribs) 05:46, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Comment: I have already read and copyedited this article. Willbb234Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 05:46, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    Copyedited roughly ten days ago. All good.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
    Plenty of WP:RS to back up information.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Covers the topic well and explains the key areas in detail
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    Written neutrally
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
    Stable
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    A single, non-free image but with fair use rationales. Used appropriately
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Very well written article. More images would have been good, but due to the subject of the article, good images are hard to come by.