This article was nominated for deletion on 25 August 2020. The result of the discussion was keep.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This is in regards to this revert. (copying response from my talk page) I don't agree that it's WP:DUE even under WP:BLPSPS. So what if they started a petition about something? Unless independent sources have taken note of it and given it coverage, it's just a self-serving claim. It's an encyclopedia article about Haglund, not a PR vehicle for his foundation. Schazjmd(talk)23:19, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
My rationale for including the petition, which is being advertised by the foundation, is that it would seem to add color to the supposed mission of the foundation to provide "grants for education about homelessness and opioid addiction." Just reposting the mission statement is to give in to foundation PR; to provide more detail allows for improved neutrality. White 720 (talk) 23:54, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing the Foundation has done has been reported on by any independent source, incidentally, so OK with omitting the Foundation from Mr. Haglund's page altogether. White 720 (talk) 23:56, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
