Talk:Cardiolipin

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Biophysics (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biophysics, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BiophysicsWikipedia:WikiProject BiophysicsTemplate:WikiProject BiophysicsBiophysics articles

Chemicals Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Chriality - the image shows a symmetrical molecule, which means that each glycerol group has opposite chirality - this seems unlikely to me

Fixed reference 12, the doi was incorrect Silasmellor (talk) 16:45, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Chirality - I think it has 2-fold rotational symmetry, not mirror symmetry. Thus the two glycerols superimpose and have the same chirality. On the other hand th central glycerol has its chiral carbon on the axis, so here it is mirror symmetry. Eaberry (talk) 02:30, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This article needs to be cleaned up. Esp the section about apoptosis. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.9.12.243 (talk) 21:30, 11 June 2009 (UTC) Agreed - these are proposed theories, highly contraversial in the field.[reply]

_______________

I think the cardiolipin is made of two fosfatidic acids connected by a glycerol instead of two phosphatidylglycerols. The cardiolipin would have four molecules of glycerol in the second case, but it has only three. Where is the glycerol of the polar head of the second phosphatidylglycerol? In animals the last step of the biosynthesis pathway is a reaction between a phosphatidylglycerol and a diacilglycerol (carried by CDP as CDP-DAG). I mean in the reaction there is just one molecule of phosphatidylglycerol. In bacteria the reaction is between two phosphatidylhglycerols but a glycerol is released, so the resultant cardiolipin cannot be chemically described as two linked phosphatidylglycerols. Am I wrong? Miguelferig (talk) 22:26, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I agree- the original author obviously meant phosphatidic acid where he wrote phosphatidyl glycerol. Phosphatidylglycerol has two glycerol moieties, so if they are linked by a "central glycerol backbone", there would be five, not three! I will make this long-overdue correction. Eaberry (talk) 02:18, 11 September 2014 (UTC) __________________[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cardiolipin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081205063447/http://www.lipidlibrary.co.uk:80/Lipids/dpg/index.htm to http://www.lipidlibrary.co.uk/Lipids/dpg/index.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:58, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]