Talk:Cardigan Mountain School

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Schools Low‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: New Hampshire Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	New Hampshire portal This article is supported by WikiProject New Hampshire (assessed as Low-importance).

Deletion

Why was this page deleted??? El Oso 04:28, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This page has no references and is based completely on opinion. It is merely advertising a crappy school. Im sorry if i have ruined your ego. :above comment by 68.68.183.176 21:11, 17 August 2006 Kappa 14:05, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry about the tone of the comment by 68.68.183.176 above, but the point about advertising and no references is valid. Wikipedia articles have to be "neutral" and "verifiable". If you say "Our small residential community ensures students receive maximum attention in all facets of school life" you are writing from the point of view of the school, not a neutral point of view. Also you have no way to prove this to a skeptical reader. Furthermore it looks like it was taken directly from something published by the school, which makes it a copyright violation.
I'm sure there is a lot to say about the school, but please try to do it in a non-promotional way and provide external sources for any claims that are likely to be disputed. See the General Tips section of WikiProject Schools and the schools listed on that page which have featured articles (e.g. Hopkins School). Kappa 00:39, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The fact that other people feel the need to appologize for your behavior is something you should really think about. Skiendog (talk) 07:14, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the deletion log for this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/delete&page=Cardigan_Mountain_School Kappa 14:05, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I deleted as the article was likely as all a copyvio and was a total advert. I've restored a much earlier non copyvio version in it's place - hopefully that will be better than nada -- Tawker 18:49, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Cardigan Mountain School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:30, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]