Talk:Cardiff Castle/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: ColonelHenry (talk · contribs) 03:02, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

I look forward to reviewing this article. I expect to complete my review within 48 hours. --ColonelHenry (talk) 03:02, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   prose flows well and is both concise and informative

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Has an appropriate reference section:

   B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

   this article is very well supported by by solid academic references, periodical articles, and governmental reports.

   C. No original research:

   I do not see any "original research" concerns.

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   this article is comprehensive in its coverage of the subject and its history

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

   no bias detected at all.

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

   In the last two years, only minor vandalism. I do not see any content disputes that became edit wars.

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   no copyvio issues, images are appropriately creditited and tagged.

   B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   Congratulations to preparing an comprehensive and excellent article that deserves Good Article Status.