Talk:Carbyne

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Carbyne was copied or moved into Linear acetylenic carbon with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Hund's rule

This article claims that carbynes violate Hund's rule. If you look up the article on Hund's Rule you will see that only one violation ("the first" observed, according to the article) has been experimentally confirmed and that this was in 2004. The exception is the molecule 5-Dehydro-m-xylylene, but this particular molecule's carbon atoms all are in R-C-R' configurations; it does not appear that a carbyne is present in 5-Dehydro-m-xylylene.

Do carbynes violate Hund's rule, or was this claim made mistakenly? I added a dubious tag after skimming the existing citations; if this is a verifiable claim, then this article AND the article on Hund's rule(s) needs to be updated. I hope this tag and my edit here help to clarify the article and the discussion of Hund's rule and carbynes! Thanks! Spiral5800 (talk) 10:43, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hund formulated his rule for atoms with several orbitals of equal energy. It should only be applied to molecules when the orbitals considered are of equal energy. The cited article by Ruzsicska et al. does not mention Hund's rule. It gives the electronic configuration of CH as 1σ² 2σ² 3σ² 1π. The molecule is a doublet and not a quartet simply because the 3σ orbital is lower than the 1π. It is not an exception to Hund's rule because the rule does not apply when the orbitals are not degenerate. CF, CCl and CBr are analogous. The mention of Hund's rule should be deleted from this article and the electron configuration explained properly.

The xylylene derivative is different because there are three localized orbitals which are separated in space and of almost equal energy, so that there are in fact three unpaired electrons as suggested by Hund's rule, but two of them have spin up and one has spin down. In that sense it is an exception. This also needs to be explained properly, either in the Hund's rule article or in the article on the molecule in question. Dirac66 (talk) 02:45, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am removing the "Expert attention needed" tag since the dispute appears to have been resolved. --Jorge Stolfi (talk) 23:39, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why does "ethylidyne" redirect here?

Not mentioned in article. 86.130.41.222 (talk) 13:47, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Carbyne. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930155033/http://www.u-bourgogne.fr/EuroH-2000/furno.pdf to http://www.u-bourgogne.fr/EuroH-2000/furno.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:08, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]