Talk:Carbon Leaf

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.

Virginia Low‑importance

	Virginia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Please leave the color picture with Audio alone....Thanks in advance *Scott Fisher

Carbon leaf is one dang cool band. 71.136.175.93 02:11, 17 December 2006 (UTC)Shereen[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Indian Summer (album).jpg

Image:Indian Summer (album).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:59, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Echo Echo.jpg

Image:Echo Echo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:33, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Loveloss.jpg

Image:Loveloss.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:21, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:5 Alive!.jpg

Image:5 Alive!.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:55, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use of images

I have been doing my best to restore the use of the cover images by providing fair use rationales, but I'm not an expert at it. I believe I need additional fair use rationales to justify the use of the covers on this page. If anyone has any experience with this, I would appreciate help before anything is deleted. Ian Burnet (talk) 14:48, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Realised i should note...

I just realised that a few weeks ago i accidentally edited this article from my primary account after having contributed from my secondary account in the past. I wasn't paying attention to which account was logged in at the time. User:Jh0367 (secondary) and User:Deliriousandlost (primary) are both my accounts. As i am a frequent contributor to this article of late and meant no harm i thought it best to note this before any issue might arise. jh0367 ☯ ^TALK 08:42, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

leaving Vanguard ?

For the time being i have removed the mention of the band leaving Vanguard Records, which apparently was announced on 20 March 2010 in a concert. As of Sunday evening, 21 March the Vanguard Records website still lists Carbon Leaf as a signed act and i can find no mention of this on the band's website or forums. I can't even find mention of a CL concert taking place on the 20th but with the way they tour there likely was one. If this is true then perhaps this is a case of waiting 'til after the weekend for things to be updated. For something of this magnitude a reference is really a necessity in my opinion. delirious & lost ☯ ^~hugs~ 02:46, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks to a fellow fan posting it on the CL forum [1] i cited the band leaving Vanguard to the radio interview.

webpage : http://1061thecorner.com/pages/4418003.php?contentType=33&contentId=74704
direct url : http://67.72.16.166/wcnr/2281464.mp3

I also cleaned up the references so that i think all of them now have a uniform style of recording the access date. Thank you to 67.166.175.126 for the breaking news and i hope you don't mind that i removed it pending a citable source. delirious & lost ☯ ^~hugs~ 20:29, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

At this point, more than four years later, I don't think the decision to leave Vanguard belongs in the lede. Frank Lynch (talk) 03:34, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

How the West was One

The name of their new album has been released. It went on preorder earlier thus week with a digital download of the seven songs that are on the album. Whether more are on the album or not has not been said. How should this info be added, should their just be a new section for their independent years that mentions the album, or should I go ahead and make a page for the album itself? 69.251.92.84 (talk) 03:29, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I so want to create the new article too. I did find a few mentions of the article. The album articles are all really sparse. I would suggest main article mention until you at least have as much info as NRWW has. Ummm in looking into it before saving this note, users editing via IP address are not able at this time to create articles without going through Articles for Creation. I am going to create it at How the West was One (Carbon Leaf album) and when i have enough to be at least a solid "stub class" article i will save it. It might be a few hours but still faster than AFC would be. There is already a rap album by someone else at How the West was One so i will also have to tweak the disambiguation. Once i save the stub feel free to expand on it. delirious & lost ☯ ^~hugs~ 06:02, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There is a stub class article now for HTTWO. Feel free to expand on it. As to the main article it is in the discography (no charting yet). There is the nice interview from the Seattle radio station 103.7 the mountain that contains mention of this being the first in a series of releases to come in the next 12 months, November and April 2011 are the plan. However i am having no luck tracking down the actual mp3 file of the radio show to use it to cite a segment in the main article on this. You could start a new section for the "Again indie" years but at the one sentence i have that is referenced it is very short and for now not being included because i can't find a practical way to work it into the article. delirious & lost ☯ ^~hugs~ 08:27, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Carbon Leaf. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/19981212023538/http://www.carbonleaf.com/ to http://www.carbonleaf.com/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050308005038/http://www.iuma.com:80/ to http://www.iuma.com
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/19981212023538/http://www.carbonleaf.com/ to http://www.carbonleaf.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:11, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Carbon Leaf. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:40, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Carbon Leaf. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:37, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Carbon Leaf. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:21, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]