Talk:Carbohydrate–insulin model
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This article is incomplete and misleading.
[edit]it ignores what the CIM actailly states, which is that hi GL meals are the cause of obesity. There is no dispute concerning the CIM as a physiological fact. Jcdonelson (talk) 19:11, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
- There is a dispute though. The mainstream view is that calorie intake being higher than expenditure is the cause of weight gain, regardless of the glycemic index/glycemic load/amount of carbohydrates consumed, etc. (t · c) buidhe 21:38, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
- Nope no dispute Please read these:
- https://academic.oup.com/ajcn/article/114/6/1873/6369073
- https://www.nature.com/articles/s41430-022-01179-2
- https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6082688/
- This is real science not some meme BS.
- Those that deny it are just attempting to maintain their unworkable model. Jcdonelson (talk) 15:19, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Well I clicked on the first link and it notes correctly that the energy balance model is the mainstream view and the basis of public health recommendations, not the CIM... (t · c) buidhe 17:33, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- For a long time it was mainstream that the earth was flat.
- Just because it is "mainstream" does not mean is is the correct or the beast model.
- Shame you did not read the entire article. Jcdonelson (talk) 16:52, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- See WP:rgw (t · c) buidhe 18:05, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- Well I clicked on the first link and it notes correctly that the energy balance model is the mainstream view and the basis of public health recommendations, not the CIM... (t · c) buidhe 17:33, 3 February 2023 (UTC)