Talk:Caravan (Rush song)

Canada: Music Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian music.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Rock music

	Rock music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

To contest this Speedy Deletion, one would simply need to remove the info from Clockwork Angels. Singles are generally not deleted material. Wisdom89 _{(_T / ^C)} 06:38, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In other words, split the information. There is more than enough justification to retain the article. Wisdom89 _{(_T / ^C)} 06:40, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dissapointing

The 2 singles I'e listened to are very dissapointing, just doesn't sound like RUSH. And what I had noticed about the article is it lists it as progressive rock. It obviously is not. Not in the lyrics, not in the music, not prog about it. It's simply hard rock, and that's what's dissapointing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.255.22.231 (talk) 17:41, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This talk page is for discussing improvements to the article, not about the article's subject. As for the progressive rock label, we'll wait until others have weighed in and some reviews have been written. Wisdom89 _{(_T / ^C)} 18:00, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

P:: Ok Sorry, yeah I guess my whole point was that even though Rush is known for Progressive Rock, these songs shouldn't be listed as it. Which seems unfair. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.255.22.231 (talk) 20:22, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No apologies necessary. I'll remove the progressive rock label for now. Wisdom89 _{(_T / ^C)} 20:55, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, despite the album being labelled as a concept album, it doesn't sound like progressive rock to me (its also disappointing, but this isn't the place to discuss that!) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.31.134.232 (talk) 18:15, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

CD release track order

I noticed on my CD version of the single, the songs are listed in the correct order, but actually appear in the opposite order with "BU2B" first. I'm wondering first of all if anybody else with a physical CD noticed this, and if so, how it should be dealt with in the tracklisting section of the article? Cheers. Frehley72 (talk) 18:57, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]